Geographical forwarding algorithm based video content delivery scheme for internet of vehicles (IoV)

This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by IEEE Multimedia Communications Technical Committee in MMTC Communications – Frontiers on 31/07/2020, available online: https://mmc.committees.comsoc.org/files/2020/07/MMTC_Communication_Frontier_July_2020.pdf The accepted version of the publication may differ from the final published version.An evolved form of Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANET) has recently emerged as the Internet of Vehicles (IoV). Though, there are still some challenges that need to be addressed in support IoV applications. The objective of this research is to achieve an efficient video content transmission over vehicular networks. We propose a balanced video-forwarding algorithm for delivering video-based content delivery scheme. The available neighboring vehicles will be ranked to the vehicle in forwarding progress before transmitting the video frames using proposed multi-score function. Considering the current beacon reception rate, forwarding progress and direction to destination, in addition to residual buffer length; the proposed algorithm can elect the best candidate to forward the video frames to the next highest ranked vehicles in a balanced way taking in account their residual buffer lengths. To facilitate the proposed video content delivery scheme, an approach of H.264/SVC was improvised to divide video packets into various segments, to be delivered into three defined groups. These created segments can be encoded and decoded independently and integrated back to produce the original packet sent by source vehicle. Simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed algorithm in improving the perceived video quality compared with other approache

Green network protocols and algorithms

Lloret, J.; Ghafoor, KZ.; Rawat, DB.; Nasser, Y. (2015). Green network protocols and algorithms. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 58:192-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.004S1921935

A comprehensive survey on congestion control techniques and the research challenges on VANET

The nature of vehicular mobility and high speed of vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) with dynamic change in the network topology let the vehicular remain as one of the most challenging problems in vehicular-to-vehicular (V2V) communications. Information dissemination is the major problem in VANET with a fixed bandwidth which is causing congestion on the resources, such as channels and affects the performance of the important application, especially when the emergency or secure transmission of messages is exchanged between the vehicles-to-vehicles communication. To mitigate these problems and introduce a safe vehicular environment in urban and highway, congestion detection and control has been considered and with various strategies and techniques which is take the attention of researchers in VANET. In our survey we mentioned recent techniques and approaches which is used in congestion detection and control and applied different matrices and parameters which is used to evaluate these approaches. In addition, the study also explained the limitation and problems that face the current congestion detection and control schemes, finally we present various solution approach and future expectations in vehicular communication

Realistic and Efficient Radio Propagation Model for V2X Communications

Multiple wireless devices are being widely deployed in Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) services on the road to establish end-to-end connection between vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) networks. Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) play an important role in supporting V2V and V2I communications (also called V2X communications) in a variety of urban environments with distinct topological characteristics. In fact, obstacles such as big buildings, moving vehicles, trees, advertisement boards, traffic lights, etc. may block the radio signals in V2X communications. Their impact has been neglected in VANET research. In this paper, we present a realistic and efficient radio propagation model to handle different sizes of static and moving obstacles for V2X communications. In the proposed model, buildings and large moving vehicles are modeled as static and moving obstacles, and taken into account their impact on the packet reception rate, Line-of-sight (LOS) obstruction, and received signal power. We use unsymmetrical city map which has many dead-end roads and open faces. Each dead-end road and open faces are joined to the nearest edge making a polygon to model realistic obstacles. The simulation results of proposed model demonstrates better performance compared to some existing models, that shows proposed model can reflect more realistic simulation environments.Khokhar, RH.; Zia, T.; Ghafoor, KZ.; Lloret, J.; Shiraz, M. (2013). Realistic and Efficient Radio Propagation Model for V2X Communications. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems. 7(8):1933-1954. doi:10.3837/tiis.2013.08.011S193319547

An Intelligent Vertical Handover Scheme for Audio and Video Streaming in Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks

In heterogeneous vehicular networks, the most challenging issue is obtaining an efficient vertical handover during the vehicle roaming process. Efficient network selection process can achieve satisfactory Quality of Service for ongoing applications. In this paper, we propose an Intelligent Network Selection (INS) scheme based on maximization scoring function to efficiently rank available wireless network candidates. Three input parameters were utilized to develop a maximization scoring function that collected data from each network candidate during the selection process. These parameters are: Faded Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Residual Channel Capacity, and Connection Life Time. The results show that the proposed INS scheme is more efficient at decreasing handover delays, End-to-End delays for VoIP and Video applications, packet loss ratios as well as increasing the efficiency of network selection processes in comparison with the state of the arts.Sadiq, AS.; Abu Bakar, K.; Ghafoor, KZ.; Lloret, J.; Khokhar, R. (2013). An Intelligent Vertical Handover Scheme for Audio and Video Streaming in Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks. Mobile Networks and Applications. 18(6):879-895. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0465-8S879895186Chen YS, Cheng CH, Hsu CS, Chiu GM (2009) Network mobility protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. In: Wireless communications and networking conference, IEEE, pp 1–6Ghafoor KZ, Abu Bakar K, Lee K, AL-Hashimi H (2010) A novel delay-and reliability-aware inter-vehicle routing protocol. Netw Protoc Algorithm 2(2):66–88Ghafoor KZ, Abu Bakar K, Lloret J, Khokhar RH, Lee KC (2013) Intelligent beaconless geographical forwarding for urban vehicular environments. Wirel netw 19(3):345–362Prakash A, Tripathi S, Verma R, Tyagi N, Tripathi R, Naik K (2011) Vehicle assisted cross-layer handover scheme in nemo-based vanets (vanemo). Int J Internet Protoc Technol 6(1):83–95Lee C-W, Chen MC, Sun YS (2013) Protocol and architecture supports for network mobility with qos-handover for high-velocity vehicles. Wirel Netw 19(5):811–830Pereira P, Casaca A, Rodrigues JJPC, Soares VNGJ, Triay Joan, Cervelló-Pastor C (2011) From delay-tolerant networks to vehicular delay-tolerant networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 1(4):1166–1182Lloret J, Canovas A, Catalá A, Garcia M (2013) Group-based protocol and mobility model for vanets to offer internet access. J Netw Comput Appl 36(3):10271038Ghafoor KZ, Lloret J, Abu Bakar K, Sadiq AS, Mussa SAB (2013) Beaconing approaches in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. Wirel Pers Commun 1–28. doi: 10.1007/s11277-013-1222-9Wang L, Kuo G (2011) Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks?a tutorial. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(1):271–292Nguyen-Vuong QT, Ghamri-Doudane Y, Agoulmine N (2008) On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks. In: Network operations and management symposium. Salvador, Bahia, pp 144–151Canovas A, Bri D, Sendra S, Lloret J (2012) Vertical WLAN handover algorithm and protocol to improve the IPTV QoS of the end user. ON, Ottawa, pp 1901–1905Varma VK, Ramesh S, Wong KD, Barton M, Hayward G, Friedhoffer JA (2003) Mobility management in integrated UMTS/WLAN networks. In: International conference on communications. IEEE, USA, pp 1048–1053Mohanty S (2006) A new architecture for 3G and WLAN integration and inter-system handover management. Wirel Netw 12(6):733–745Rivera-Lara EJ, Herrerías-Hernández R, Pérez-Díaz JA, García-Hernández CF (2008) Analysis of the relationship between QoS and snr for an 802.11 g wlan. In: International conference on communication theory, reliability, and quality of service. IEEE, Bucharest, pp 103–107Rappaport TS (2002) Wireless communications principles and practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle RiverCarpenter T (2007) CWNA certified wireless network administrator official study guide (Exam PW0-100). McGraw-Hill Osborne Media, New YorkEberspacher J, Eberspächer J, Bettstetter C, Vögel HJ, Hartmann C, Vgel HJ, et al (2009) GSM-architecture, protocols and services. Wiley, New YorkWLAN-MAC (2007) Wireless lan medium access control (MAC) and physical layer specifications. IEEE Comput Soc, pp 1–1183. http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/802.11.html ,Kappler C (2009) UMTS networks and beyond. Wiley, New YorkEgoh K, De S (2006) A multi-criteria receiver-side relay election approach in wireless ad hoc networks. In: Military communications conference. IEEE, Washington, DC, pp 1–7Bucciol P, Ridolfo F, De Martin JC (2008) Multicast voice transmission over vehicular ad hoc networks: issues and challenges. In: Seventh international conference on networking. IEEE, Cancun, pp 746–751Thonet G, Allard-Jacquin P, Colle P (2008) Zigbee–wifi coexistence, Schneider electric white paperRibadeneira AF (2007) An analysis of the mos under conditions of delay, jitter and packet loss and an analysis of the impact of introducing piggybacking and Reed Solomon fec for VoIP. Computer science theses, pp 44Karapantazis S, Pavlidou FN (2009) Voip: A comprehensive survey on a promising technology. Comput Netw 53(12):2050–2090Ortiz C, Frigon JF, Sanso B, Girard A (2008) Effective bandwidth evaluation for voip applications in ieee 802.11 networks. In: Wireless communications and mobile computing conference. IEEE, Crete Island, pp 926–931International Telecommunication Union (1996) Telecommunication Standardization Sector. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality, international telecommunication unionLi D, Pan J (2008) Evaluating MPEG-4/AVC video streaming over ieee 802.11 wireless distribution system. In: Wireless communications and networking conference. WCNC 2008 IEEE, IEEE, pp 2147–2152Yan X, Mani N, Cekercioglu YA (2008) A traveling distance prediction based method to minimize unnecessary handovers from cellular networks to WLANS. Commun Lett IEEE 12(1):14–16Lo SC, Lee G, Chen WT, Liu JC (2004) Architecture for mobility and QoS support in all-ip wireless networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 22(4):691–705Pries R, Staehle D, Tran-Gia P, Gutbrod T (2008) A seamless vertical handover approach. In: Cerd?-Alabern L (ed) Wireless systems and mobility in next generation internet, vol 5122. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 167–184Munasinghe KS, Jamalipour A (2010) An analytical evaluation of mobility management in integrated WLAN-UMTS networks. Comput Electr Eng 36(4):735–75

Seamless Outdoors-Indoors Localization Solutions on Smartphones: Implementation and Challenges

© ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in http://doi.org/10.1145/2871166[EN] The demand for more sophisticated Location-Based Services (LBS) in terms of applications variety and accuracy is tripling every year since the emergence of the smartphone a few years ago. Equally, smartphone manufacturers are mounting several wireless communication and localization technologies, inertial sensors as well as powerful processing capability, to cater to such LBS applications. A hybrid of wireless technologies is needed to provide seamless localization solutions and to improve accuracy, to reduce time to fix, and to reduce power consumption. The review of localization techniques/technologies of this emerging field is therefore important. This article reviews the recent research-oriented and commercial localization solutions on smartphones. The focus of this article is on the implementation challenges associated with utilizing these positioning solutions on Android-based smartphones. Furthermore, the taxonomy of smartphone-location techniques is highlighted with a special focus on the detail of each technique and its hybridization. The article compares the indoor localization techniques based on accuracy, utilized wireless technology, overhead, and localization technique used. The pursuit of achieving ubiquitous localization outdoors and indoors for critical LBS applications such as security and safety shall dominate future research efforts.This research was sponsored by Koya University, Kurdistan Region-Iraq. The authors also would like to thank Dr. Ali Al-Sherbaz (from the University of Northampton-UK) and Dr. Naseer Al-Jawad (from the University of Buckingham-UK) for providing and improving the quality of this article in terms of academic and technical writing.Maghdid, HS.; Lami, IA.; Ghafoor, KZ.; Lloret, J. (2016). Seamless Outdoors-Indoors Localization Solutions on Smartphones: Implementation and Challenges. ACM Computing Surveys. 48(4):1-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2871166S134484I. Adusei, K. Kyamakya, and K. Jobmann. 2002. Mobile positioning technologies in cellular networks: An evaluation of their performance metrics. Proceedings of MILCOM 2002. 2, 1239--1244.Faiz Anuar and Ulrike Gretzel. 2011. Privacy concerns in the context of location-based services for tourism. In ENTER 2011 Conference, Innsbruck, Austria.A. Bensky. 2008. Wireless Positioning Technologies and Applications. Artech House, Inc. Norwood, MA.Azzedine Boukerche, Horacio A. B. F. Oliveira, Eduardo F. Nakamura, and Antonio A. F. Loureiro. 2007. Localization systems for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communications 14, 6, 6--12.Azzedine Boukerche, Horacio A. B. F. Oliveira, Eduardo F. Nakamura, and Antonio A. F. Loureiro. 2008. Secure localization algorithms for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 46, 4, 96--101.Azzedine Boukerche, Horacio A. B. F. Oliveira, Eduardo F. Nakamura, and Antonio A. F. Loureiro. 2008. Vehicular ad hoc networks: A new challenge for localization-based systems. Computer Communications 31, 12, 2838--2849.M. Butler. 2011. Android: Changing the Mobile Landscape. PERVASIVE Computing 10, 1, 4--7.J. Caffery and G. Stuber. 1998. Overview of radiolocation in CDMA cellular systems. IEEE Communications Magazine 36, 4, 38--45.Suma S. Cherian and Ashok N. Rudrapatna. 2013. LTE location technologies and delivery solutions. Bell Labs Technical Journal 18, 2, 175--194.M. Ciurana, D. Lopez, and F. Barcelo-Arroyo. 2009. SofTOA: Software ranging for TOA-based positioning of WLAN terminals. Location and Context Awareness 207--221.Paul Craven, Ronald Wong, Neal Fedora, and Paul Crampton. 2013. Studying the Effects of Interference on GNSS Signals. International Technical Meeting. San Diego, California: The Institute of Navigation, 893--186.D. Dardari, P. Closas, and P. M. Djuric. 2015. Indoor tracking: Theory, methods, and technologies. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 64, 4, 1263--1278.Guido De Angelis, Giuseppe Baruffa, and Saverio Cacopardi. 2012. GNSS/Cellular hybrid positioning system for mobile users in urban scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 14, 1, 313--321.Horacio Antonio Braga Fernandes De Oliveira, Azzedine Boukerche, Eduardo Freire Nakamura, and Antonio Alfredo Ferreira Loureiro. 2009. An efficient directed localization recursion protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers 58, 5, 677--691.Francescantonio Della Rosa, Mauro Pelosi, and Jari Nurmi. 2012. Human-induced effects on RSS ranging measurements for cooperative positioning. International Journal of Navigation and Observation 13.Zhongliang Deng, Yanpei Yu, Xie Yuan, Neng Wan, and Lei Yang. 2013. Situation and development tendency of indoor positioning. China Communications 10, 3, 42--55.Mohammed Elbes, Ala Al-Fuqaha, and Muhammad Anan. 2013. A precise indoor localization approach based on particle filter and dynamic exclusion techniques. Network Protocols and Algorithms 5, 2, 50--71.R. Faragher and R. Harle. 2013. SmartSLAM--an efficient smartphone indoor positioning system exploiting machine learning and opportunistic sensing. In ION GNSS.Zahid Farid, Rosdiadee Nordin, and Mahamod Ismail. 2013. Recent advances in wireless indoor localization techniques and system. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications 12.S. A. Fayaz. 2013. Location service for wireless network using improved RSS-based cellular localisation. International Journal of Electronics 1--16.C. Feng, W. Au, S. Valaee, and Z. Tan. 2010. Compressive sensing based positioning using RSS of WLAN access points. In 2010 Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 1--9.Ruijun Fu, Yunxing Ye, and K. Pahlavan. 2012. Heterogeneous cooperative localization for social networks with mobile devices. In IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’12).T. Gallagher, B. Li, A. Kealy, and A. Dempster. 2009. Trials of commercial Wi-Fi positioning systems for indoor and urban canyons. In IGNSS 2009 Symposium on GPS/GNSS.T. Gallagher, E. Wise, B. Li, A. Dempster, C. Rizos, and E. Ramsey-Stewart. 2012. Indoor positioning system based on sensor fusion for the blind and visually impaired. In 2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN’12), 1--9.Miguel Garcia, Diana Bri, Jesus Tomas, and Jaime Lloret. 2013. A cooperative decision making algorithm for wireless location systems using interlinking data. In 10th International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering (CDVE’13). Mallorca, Spain.Miguel Garcia, Fernando Boronat, Jesus Tomás, and Jaime Lloret. 2009. The development of two systems for indoor wireless sensors self-location. Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks 8, 3--4, 235--258.A. Günther and C. Hoene. 2005. Measuring round trip times to determine the distance between wlan nodes. In Proceedings of Networking 2005. Springer, 768--779.R. Hansen, R. Wind, C. Jensen, and B. Thomsen. 2009. Seamless indoor/outdoor positioning handover for location-based services in streamspin. In 10th International Conference on Mobile Data Management: Systems, Services and Middleware (MDM’09), 267--272.R. Harle. 2013. A survey of indoor inertial positioning systems for pedestrians. In IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 15, 3, 1281--1293.A. Hassan and S. Khairulmizam. 2009. Integration of global positioning system and inertial navigation system with different sampling rate using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Science Journal 7, 98--106.J. Hightower and G. Borriello. 2001. Location systems for ubiquitous computing. Computer 34, 8, 57--66.C. Hoene and J. Willmann. 2008. Four-way TOA and software-based trilateration of IEEE 802.11 devices. In IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’08), 1--6.J. Huang, D. Millman, M. Quigley, D. Stavens, S. Thrun, and A. Aggarwal. 2011. Efficient, generalized indoor WiFi GRAPHSLAM. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA’11), 1038--1043.L. Hui, Y. Lei, and W. Yuanfei. 2010. UWB, Multi-sensors and WiFi-mesh based precision positioning for urban rail traffic. In Ubiquitous Positioning Indoor Navigation and Location Based Service (UPINLBS’10), 1--8.Ihsan Alshahib Lami, S. Halgurd Maghdid, and Torben Kuseler. 2014. SILS: A smart indoors localization scheme based on on-the-go cooperative smartphones networks using onboard bluetooth, WiFi and GNSS. In Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+’14). Tampa, FL.T. Iwase and R. Shibasaki. 2013. Infra-free indoor positioning using only smartphone sensors. In 2013 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN’13).S. Jin. 2012. Global Navigation Satellite Systems: Signal, Theory and Applications. In Tech. 438 pages.K. Kalliola. 2008. Bringing navigation indoors. The Way We Live Next. Nokia.J. Kim, J. Lee, and C. Park. 2008. A mitigation of line-of-sight by TDOA error modeling in wireless communication system. In International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS’08), 1601--1605.S. Koenig, M. Schmidt, and C. Hoene. 2011. Multipath mitigation for indoor localization based on IEEE 802.11 time-of-flight measurements. In 2011 IEEE International Symposium on World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM’11), 1--8.N. Kohtake, S. Morimoto, S. Kogure, and D. Manandhar. 2011. Indoor and outdoor seamless positioning using indoor messaging system and GPS. In International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN’11).A. LaMarca, Y. Chawathe, S. Consolvo, J. Hightower, I. Smith, J. Scott, et al. 2005. Place lab: Device positioning using radio beacons in the wild. Pervasive Computing 301--306.J. Lee, Z. Lin, P. Chin, and K. Yar. 2010. One way ranging time drift compensation for both synchronized and non-synchronized clocks. In 2010 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE’10), 327--331.Jae-Eun Lee and Sanguk Lee. 2010. Indoor initial positioning using single clock pseudolite system. In 2010 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC’10), 575--578.B. Li, A. G. Dempster, and C. Rizos. 2010. Positioning in environments where GPS fails. FIG Congress, Sydney, Australia, 1--18.D. Lim, S. Lee, and D. Cho. 2007. Design of an assisted GPS receiver and its performance analysis. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS’0), 1742--1745.H. Liu, H. Darabi, P. Banerjee, and J. Liu. 2007. Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 37, 6, 1067--1080.Kaikai Liu, Qiuyuan Huang, Wang Jiecong, Li Xiaolin, and D. O. Wu. 2013. Improving GPS service via social collaboration. In 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS’13).X. Liu, S. Zhang, J. Quan, and X. Lin. 2010. The experimental analysis of outdoor positioning system based on fingerprint approach. In 2010 12th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT’13), 369--372.Jaime Lloret, Jesus Tomas, Alejandro Canovas, and Irene Bellver. 2011. A geopositioning system based on WiFi networks. In The 7th International Conference on Networking and Services (ICNS’11). Venice, Italy.Jaime Lloret, Jesus Tomás, Miguel Garcia, and Alejandro Cánovas. 2009. A hybrid stochastic approach for self-location of wireless sensors in indoor environments. Sensors 9, 5, 3695--3712.Diego Lopez-de-Ipina, Bernhard Klein, Christian Guggenmos, Jorge Perez, and Guillermo Gil. 2011. User-Aware semantic location models for service provision. International Symposium on Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Riviera Maya, Mexico.Dimitrios Lymberopoulos, Jie Liu, Xue Yang, Romit Roy Choudhury, Vlado Handziski, and Souvik Sen. 2015. A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies: Experiences and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. ACM, New York, NY.N. Mahiddin, N. Safie, E. Nadia, S. Safei, and E. Fadzli. 2012. Indoor position detection using WiFi and trilateration technique. The International Conference on Informatics and Applications (ICIA’12), 362--366.T. Manodham, L. Loyola, and T. Miki. 2008. A novel wireless positioning system for seamless internet connectivity based on the WLAN infrastructure. Wireless Personal Communications 44, 3, 295--309.Alex Mariakakis, Souvik Sen, Jeongkeun Lee, and Kyu-Han Kim. 2014. Single access point based indoor localization. In Proceedings of ACM MobiSys.R. Mautz. 2009. The challenges of indoor environments and specification on some alternative positioning systems. In 6th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication (WPNC’09), 29--36.M. Mock, R. Frings, E. Nett, and S. Trikaliotis. 2000. Clock synchronization for wireless local area networks. 12th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (Euromicro RTS’00), 183--189.E. Mok. 2010. Using outdoor public WiFi and GPS integrated method for position updating of knowledge-based logistics system in dense high rise urban environments. 8th International Conference on Supply Chain Management and Information Systems (SCMIS’10), 1--4.D. Niculescu and B. Nath. 2004. VOR base stations for indoor 802. 11 positioning. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking 26, 58--69.T. Oshin, S. Poslad, and A. Ma. 2012. Improving the energy-efficiency of GPS based location sensing smartphone applications. In IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom’12), 1698--1705.R. Padilla. 2013. Apple retail stores to integrate iBeacon systems to assist with sales and services. Retrieved January 19, 2016 from http://www.macrumors.com/2013/11/16/apple-retail-stores-to-integrate-ibeacon-systems-to-assist-with-sales-and-services/.D. Park and J. Park. 2011. An enhanced ranging scheme using WiFi RSSI measurements for ubiquitous location. In 1st ACIS/JNU International Conference on Computers, Networks, Systems and Industrial Engineering (CNSI’11), 296--301.J. Partyka. 2012. A look at small indoor location competitors. GPS world. Available at: http://gpsworld.com/wirelesslook-small-indoor-location-competitors-13229/ {Last access January 31, 2016}.L. Pei, R. Chen, J. Liu, Z. Liu, H. Kuusniemi, Y. Chen, et al. 2011. Sensor assisted 3D personal navigation on a smart phone in GPS degraded environments. In 19th International Conference on Geoinformatics, 1--6.R. G. Priyanka Shah. 2012, May 01. Location based reminder using GPS for mobile (Android). ARPN Journal of Science and Technology 2, 4, 377--380.C. Rizos, G. Roberts, J. Barnes, and N. Gambale. 2010. Locata: A new high accuracy indoor positioning system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, Zurich, Switzerland, 15--17.R. Rowe, P. Duffett-Smith, M. Jarvis, and N. Graube. 2008. Enhanced GPS: The tight integration of received cellular timing signals and GNSS receivers for ubiquitous positioning. In IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, 838--845.A. Roxin, J. Gaber, M. Wack, and A. Nait-Sidi-Moh. 2007. Survey of wireless geolocation techniques. In IEEE Globecom Workshops, 1--9.J. Ryoo, H. Kim, and S. Das. 2012. Geo-fencing: Geographical-fencing based energy-aware proactive framework for mobile devices. In IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service (IWQoS’12), 1--9.Souvik Sen, Jeongkeun Lee, Kyu-Han Kim, and Paul Congdon. 2013. Avoiding multipath to revive inbuilding WiFi localization. In Proceeding of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, New York, NY.Sensewhere LTD. 2011. Geo-fence technology and applications. Indoor Location Technology Leaders. Available at: http://www.sensewhere.com/images/geowhereDatasheet_compressed.pdf {Last access January 31, 2016}.I. Shafer and M. Chang L. 2010. Movement detection for power-efficient smartphone WLAN localization. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, ACM, New York, NY, 81--90.Aaron Strout and Mike Schneider. 2011. Location Based Marketing For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Fazli Subhan, Halabi Hasbullah, Azat Rozyyev, and Sheikh Tahir Bakhsh. 2011. Indoor positioning in Bluetooth networks using fingerprinting and lateration approach. In 2011 International Conference on Information Science and Applications (ICISA).Daisuke Taniuchi, Xiaopeng Liu, Daisuke Nakai, and Takuya Maekawa. 2015. Spring model based collaborative indoor position estimation with neighbor mobile devices. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 9, 2, 268--277.CSRICIII Working Group 3. 2013. E9-1-1 Location Accuracy: Indoor Location Test Bed Report. San Jose CA: The Communications Security, Reliability and Interoperability Council III. https://transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/pshs/advisory/csric3/CSRIC_III_WG3_Report_March_%202013_ILTestBedReport.pdf {Last access January 31, 2016}.Agoston Torok, Akos Nagy, Laszlo Kovats, and Peter Pach. 2014. DREAR-towards infrastructure-free indoor localization via dead-reckoning enhanced with activity recognition. In 8th International Conference on. Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies (NGMAST’14).D. McHoul. 2008. U-TDOA Enabling New Location-based Safety and Security Solutions. TruePosition-White Paper, USA, 1--10.A. Waadt, G. Bruck, and P. Jung. 2009. An overview of positioning systems and technologies. In 2nd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL’09), 1--5.M. Weyn and F. Schrooyen. 2008. A Wi-Fi Assisted GPS Positioning Concept. ECUMICT, Ghent, Belgium.S. Wibowo, M. Klepal, and D. Pesch. 2009. Time of flight ranging using off-the-self IEEE802. 11 WiFi tags. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Positioning and Context-Awareness (PoCA’09).O. Woodman and R. Harle. 2008. Pedestrian localisation for indoor environments. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 114--123.Yinfeng Wu, Ligong Li, Yongji Ren, Kefu Yi, and Ning Yu. 2014. A RSSI localization algorithm and implementation for indoor wireless sensor networks. Adhoc & Sensor Wireless Networks 22, 2.Zhuoling Xiao, Hongkai Wen, Andrew Markham, and Niki Trigoni. 2015. Robust pedestrian dead reckoning (R-PDR) for arbitrary mobile device placement. In International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation. IEEE.J. Xiong and K. Jamieson. 2011. ArrayTrack: A fine-grained indoor location system. RN 11, 19.Yi Sun, Yubin Zhao, and J. Schiller. 2014. An autonomic indoor positioning application based on smartphone. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC’14).M. Youssef, A. Youssef, C. Rieger, U. Shankar, and A. Agrawala. 2006. Pinpoint: An asynchronous time-based location determination system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services,165--176.Haejung Yun, Dongho Han, and C. Choong Lee. 2013. Understanding the use of location-based service applications: Do privacy concerns matter? Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 14, 3, 215.P. Zandbergen. 2009. Accuracy of iPhone locations: A comparison of assisted GPS, WiFi and cellular positioning. Transactions in GIS 13, s1, 5--25.Y. Zhao, M. Li, and F. Shi. 2010. Indoor radio propagation model based on dominant path. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences 3, 3, 330--337.S. Zirari, P. Canalda, and F. Spies. 2010. WiFi GPS based combined positioning algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Information Security (WCNIS’10), 684--688

An adaptive handover prediction scheme for seamless mobility based wireless networks

We propose an adaptive handover prediction (AHP) scheme for seamless mobility based wireless networks. That is, the AHP scheme incorporates fuzzy logic with AP prediction process in order to lend cognitive capability to handover decision making. Selection metrics, including received signal strength, mobile node relative direction towards the access points in the vicinity, and access point load, are collected and considered inputs of the fuzzy decision making system in order to select the best preferable AP around WLANs. The obtained handover decision which is based on the calculated quality cost using fuzzy inference system is also based on adaptable coefficients instead of fixed coefficients. In other words, the mean and the standard deviation of the normalized network prediction metrics of fuzzy inference system, which are collected from available WLANs are obtained adaptively. Accordingly, they are applied as statistical information to adjust or adapt the coefficients of membership functions. In addition, we propose an adjustable weight vector concept for input metrics in order to cope with the continuous, unpredictable variation in their membership degrees. Furthermore, handover decisions are performed in each MN independently after knowing RSS, direction toward APs, and AP load. Finally, performance evaluation of the proposed scheme shows its superiority compared with representatives of the prediction approaches.Sadiq, AS.; Fisal, NB.; Ghafoor, KZ.; Lloret, J. (2014). An adaptive handover prediction scheme for seamless mobility based wireless networks. Scientific World Journal. 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/610652S2014You, I., Han, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-S., & Chao, H.-C. (2011). Next generation mobility management. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 11(4), 443-445. doi:10.1002/wcm.1136Sepúlveda, R., Montiel-Ross, O., Quiñones-Rivera, J., & Quiroz, E. E. (2012). WLAN Cell Handoff Latency Abatement Using an FPGA Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Implementation. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2012/219602Song, W. (2012). Resource reservation for mobile hotspots in vehicular environments with cellular/WLAN interworking. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012(1). doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2012-18Sadiq, A. S., Bakar, K. A., Ghafoor, K. Z., Lloret, J., & Khokhar, R. (2013). An Intelligent Vertical Handover Scheme for Audio and Video Streaming in Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 18(6), 879-895. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0465-8Nahrstedt, K. (2011). Quality of Service in Wireless Networks Over Unlicensed Spectrum. Synthesis Lectures on Mobile and Pervasive Computing, 6(1), 1-176. doi:10.2200/s00383ed1v01y201109mpc008Magagula, L. A., Chan, H. A., & Falowo, O. E. (2011). Handover approaches for seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 12(16), 1414-1428. doi:10.1002/wcm.1074Sadiq, A. S., Bakar, K. A., Ghafoor, K. Z., Lloret, J., & Mirjalili, S. (2012). A smart handover prediction system based on curve fitting model for Fast Mobile IPv6 in wireless networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 27(7), 969-990. doi:10.1002/dac.2386Çeken, C., Yarkan, S., & Arslan, H. (2010). Interference aware vertical handoff decision algorithm for quality of service support in wireless heterogeneous networks. Computer Networks, 54(5), 726-740. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2009.09.018Dutta, A., Das, S., Famolari, D., Ohba, Y., Taniuchi, K., Fajardo, V., … Schulzrinne, H. (2007). Seamless proactive handover across heterogeneous access networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 43(3), 837-855. doi:10.1007/s11277-007-9266-3Xu, C., Teng, J., & Jia, W. (2010). Enabling faster and smoother handoffs in AP-dense 802.11 wireless networks. Computer Communications, 33(15), 1795-1803. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2010.04.044Holis, J., & Pechac, P. (2008). Elevation Dependent Shadowing Model for Mobile Communications via High Altitude Platforms in Built-Up Areas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 56(4), 1078-1084. doi:10.1109/tap.2008.91920

Advanced mobility handover for mobile IPv6 based wireless networks

We propose an Advanced Mobility Handover scheme (AMH) in this paper for seamless mobility in MIPv6-based wireless networks. In the proposed scheme, the mobile node utilizes a unique home IPv6 address developed to maintain communication with other corresponding nodes without a care-of-address during the roaming process. The IPv6 address for each MN during the first round of AMH process is uniquely identified by HA using the developed MN-ID field as a global permanent, which is identifying uniquely the IPv6 address of MN. Moreover, a temporary MN-ID is generated by access point each time an MN is associated with a particular AP and temporarily saved in a developed table inside the AP. When employing the AMH scheme, the handover process in the network layer is performed prior to its default time. That is, the mobility handover process in the network layer is tackled by a trigger developed AMH message to the next access point. Thus, a mobile node keeps communicating with the current access point while the network layer handover is executed by the next access point. The mathematical analyses and simulation results show that the proposed scheme performs better as compared with the existing approaches.Sadiq, AS.; Fisal, NB.; Ghafoor, KZ.; Lloret, J. (2014). Advanced mobility handover for mobile IPv6 based wireless networks. Scientific World Journal. 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/602808S2014You, I., Han, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-S., & Chao, H.-C. (2011). Next generation mobility management. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 11(4), 443-445. doi:10.1002/wcm.1136Li, L., Ma, L., Xu, Y., & Fu, Y. (2014). Motion Adaptive Vertical Handoff in Cellular/WLAN Heterogeneous Wireless Network. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1-7. doi:10.1155/2014/341038Nahrstedt, K. (2011). Quality of Service in Wireless Networks Over Unlicensed Spectrum. Synthesis Lectures on Mobile and Pervasive Computing, 6(1), 1-176. doi:10.2200/s00383ed1v01y201109mpc008Cho, I., Okamura, K., Kim, T. W., & Hong, C. S. (2013). Performance analysis of IP mobility with multiple care-of addresses in heterogeneous wireless networks. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1375-1386. doi:10.1007/s11276-012-0539-8Magagula, L. A., Chan, H. A., & Falowo, O. E. (2011). Handover approaches for seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 12(16), 1414-1428. doi:10.1002/wcm.1074Sadiq, A. S., Bakar, K. A., Ghafoor, K. Z., Lloret, J., & Mirjalili, S. (2012). A smart handover prediction system based on curve fitting model for Fast Mobile IPv6 in wireless networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 27(7), 969-990. doi:10.1002/dac.2386Sadiq, A. S., Bakar, K. A., Ghafoor, K. Z., Lloret, J., & Khokhar, R. (2013). An Intelligent Vertical Handover Scheme for Audio and Video Streaming in Heterogeneous Vehicular Networks. Mobile Networks and Applications, 18(6), 879-895. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0465-8Lee, K.-W., Seo, W.-K., Cho, Y.-Z., Kim, J.-W., Park, J.-S., & Moon, B.-S. (2009). Inter-domain handover scheme using an intermediate mobile access gateway for seamless service in vehicular networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 23(9-10), 1127-1144. doi:10.1002/dac.1076Lee, C.-W., Chen, M. C., & Sun, Y. S. (2012). Protocol and architecture supports for network mobility with QoS-handover for high-velocity vehicles. Wireless Networks, 19(5), 811-830. doi:10.1007/s11276-012-0503-7Castelluccia, C. (2000). HMIPv6. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 4(1), 48-59. doi:10.1145/360449.360474Modares, H., Moravejosharieh, A., Lloret, J., & Salleh, R. B. (2016). A Survey on Proxy Mobile IPv6 Handover. IEEE Systems Journal, 10(1), 208-217. doi:10.1109/jsyst.2013.2297705Modares, H., Moravejosharieh, A., Lloret, J., & Salleh, R. (2014). A survey of secure protocols in Mobile IPv6. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 39, 351-368. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2013.07.013Modares, H., Moravejosharieh, A., Salleh, R. B., & Lloret, J. (2014). Enhancing Security in Mobile IPv6. ETRI Journal, 36(1), 51-61. doi:10.4218/etrij.14.0113.0177Meneguette, R. I., Bittencourt, L. F., & Madeira, E. R. M. (2013). A seamless flow mobility management architecture for vehicular communication networks. Journal of Communications and Networks, 15(2), 207-216. doi:10.1109/jcn.2013.000034Al-Surmi, I., Othman, M., Abdul Hamid, N. A. W., & Ali, B. M. (2013). Enhancing inter-PMIPv6-domain for superior handover performance across IP-based wireless domain networks. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1317-1336. doi:10.1007/s11276-012-0535-

An Adaptive Handover Prediction Scheme for Seamless Mobility Based Wireless Networks

We propose an adaptive handover prediction (AHP) scheme for seamless mobility based wireless networks. That is, the AHP scheme incorporates fuzzy logic with AP prediction process in order to lend cognitive capability to handover decision making. Selection metrics, including received signal strength, mobile node relative direction towards the access points in the vicinity, and access point load, are collected and considered inputs of the fuzzy decision making system in order to select the best preferable AP around WLANs. The obtained handover decision which is based on the calculated quality cost using fuzzy inference system is also based on adaptable coefficients instead of fixed coefficients. In other words, the mean and the standard deviation of the normalized network prediction metrics of fuzzy inference system, which are collected from available WLANs are obtained adaptively. Accordingly, they are applied as statistical information to adjust or adapt the coefficients of membership functions. In addition, we propose an adjustable weight vector concept for input metrics in order to cope with the continuous, unpredictable variation in their membership degrees. Furthermore, handover decisions are performed in each MN independently after knowing RSS, direction toward APs, and AP load. Finally, performance evaluation of the proposed scheme shows its superiority compared with representatives of the prediction approaches